Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Blog Article
These provisions use to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, regardless of whether the transaction occurred ahead of its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the acquired counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
This is because transfer orders are typically regarded as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there could possibly be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load specified to any reported judgment might depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there could exist conflicts between the assorted reduced appellate courts. Sometimes these differences might not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, ensure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed over the day that the appellate court issues its decision and in many cases are not the court's final opinion.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability inside the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the click here court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and also the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This could take place several times because the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first with the High Court of Justice, later of your Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his progress with the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Summaries supply a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, along with the procedural elements of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.